Series 01
Screening Intelligence
What large screening programmes actually yield, where the cohort is lost across the five links, and what a completed procedure costs end to end.
QuarterlyIn preparation
Resources
Three report families.One method.
Each carries a section on where the analysis could be wrong.
Series 02
State of Primary Health
The annual position: capacity, workforce, financing and referral performance, scored on indicators a district can collect for itself.
Annual2027
Series 03
District briefings
A single district, its gap picture, its facility landscape and a costed model for closing the distance between a positive screen and a completed procedure.
On requestFirst edition drafting
The archive
Nothing is published yet.
We were founded this year. The honest position is that the archive is empty and the method is not. The first Screening Intelligence edition and the first district briefing are in preparation.
If you would like the first edition when it is out, or you want to see the indicator set before it is finalised and tell us what a district cannot actually collect, both are useful to us.
Get the first edition →What sits inside every report
The same eight parts, in the same order.
Predictable structure is not a stylistic choice. A health secretary reading their fourth briefing should know exactly where the cost table is.
01The finding
What is true, stated as a sentence, on the cover.
02The method
What was counted, how, when, and by whom.
03The baseline
Facilities, workforce, equipment and reach, as they are rather than as recorded.
04The cascade
The five links, measured separately, with the loss at each named.
05The cost
What closing each link would cost, and who would pay for it.
06The options
Two or three routes with their trade offs stated, not one recommendation dressed as inevitability.
07Where this could be wrong
The counter argument, named and taken seriously.
08Sources
Publisher and month against every figure in the document.